Identify the Writer
Establish the expert’s field, position and relevant expertise.
Recommendation letters are not one of the six standalone EB1B evidentiary criteria. They can nevertheless be valuable when qualified experts explain the beneficiary’s research, original contributions, professional recognition and influence using specific facts that are supported by objective evidence.
Establish the expert’s field, position and relevant expertise.
State whether the writer supervised, collaborated with or independently encountered the research.
Identify the actual contribution rather than offering generic praise.
Connect statements to citations, implementation, patents, publications or other objective evidence.
A conclusion without supporting facts gives USCIS little information about why the writer reached that opinion.
Describe what the beneficiary developed, how the writer learned about it, what other researchers did with the work and which records substantiate those statements.
There is no fixed regulatory number of recommendation letters.
No. Independent and dependent writers can serve different evidentiary purposes.
Letters may be important, but objective corroborating evidence generally strengthens the overall record substantially.
No. They are evidence that may help establish facts relevant to the criteria and final international recognition analysis.
Primary legal source: USCIS Policy Manual — Outstanding Professors and Researchers.