Evidentiary criteria
Which of the six regulatory criteria did USCIS accept or question?
An EB1B RFE may question the researcher’s international recognition, the three years of qualifying experience, the offered position or the petitioning employer. A strong response identifies which part of the EB1B structure USCIS is challenging before deciding what additional evidence is needed.
Which of the six regulatory criteria did USCIS accept or question?
Did USCIS conclude that the evidence as a whole failed to show the researcher is internationally recognized as outstanding?
Did USCIS question the three years, dates, academic area or underlying duties?
Did USCIS question permanence, private employer requirements or the qualifying offer?
Identify every accepted and disputed issue.
Do not mix employer defects with researcher evidence.
Determine what already answers each USCIS concern.
Fill the actual evidentiary gaps.
State what each important exhibit proves.
Explain the complete research record, not merely the number of criteria met.
A strong researcher record cannot cure a failure to establish the qualifying employer, research position or required experience.
Organize the response around international recognition, research experience, the employer and the qualifying position.
No. USCIS evaluates the evidence together to determine whether the beneficiary is internationally recognized as outstanding in the academic field.
Yes. The structural requirements and the researcher’s international recognition are separate components of EB1B eligibility.
When the RFE questions the employer, position or experience requirements, targeted employer records may be essential.
They use different legal structures and should be evaluated separately. EB1B also imposes employer, position and experience requirements that EB1A does not.