What problem are you addressing?
Define the scientific, medical, technical or engineering problem rather than merely naming the discipline.
A National Interest Waiver research case should not begin with “I have a PhD and publications.” It should begin with a specific proposed endeavor: what the researcher intends to do in the United States, why that endeavor has broader importance and why this particular researcher is positioned to advance it.
Define the scientific, medical, technical or engineering problem rather than merely naming the discipline.
Identify the research activity, methods, systems, technology or analysis you intend to pursue.
Explain the users, institutions, industries, populations or other stakeholders affected by the endeavor.
The record should explain the broader prospective implications of the endeavor rather than relying only on the importance of the current job.
Evidence may include government priorities, scientific need, public health implications, strategic technology interests, industry use and broader prospective impact.
National importance →Publications, prior contributions, research experience, funding, progress, collaborators and institutional support may help connect the researcher’s history to the future endeavor.
Well positioned →The petition should explain why, on balance, it benefits the United States to permit the researcher to pursue the endeavor without the normal job offer and labor certification process.
“I will work in artificial intelligence” does not explain the specific future endeavor.
The importance of medicine, engineering or scientific research generally is not the same as the importance of the proposed endeavor.
Recommendation letters are more useful when factual claims are supported by objective records.
Concrete projects, progress, collaborators and institutional support can make a future plan substantially more persuasive.
Review anonymized approvals involving public health, agricultural science, medical device research and physician research.
USCIS does not impose a fixed publication requirement. The evidence must establish EB2 eligibility and all NIW requirements.
No fixed citation threshold exists. Citation evidence may be useful but is not mandatory in every research based NIW case.
Potentially, if the applicant independently establishes underlying EB2 eligibility and the NIW requirements. Career stage alone does not determine the outcome.
No. A qualifying applicant may self petition for a National Interest Waiver.
Related guidance: NIW Without a PhD