Cited the Research
A writer may know the work through the applicant’s publications.
USCIS does not require a fixed number of independent expert letters in an NIW petition. An independent expert can be useful when the writer has a credible professional basis for explaining the applicant’s research, prior impact, proposed endeavor or ability to advance future work. The strongest letters are specific and supported by objective evidence.
A writer may know the work through the applicant’s publications.
The writer’s laboratory may have implemented the applicant’s research.
Industry or government experts may have adopted technical work.
Conference, committee or other independent professional activity may provide knowledge.
The writer’s reputation does not create first hand knowledge of the applicant’s achievements.
A specialist who actually cited, used or evaluated the applicant’s work may provide much more useful evidence than a famous but uninformed writer.
Best positioned to explain the applicant’s individual role in collaborative work.
Can explain outside recognition, citation or adoption.
May explain future support, resources or interest in the proposed endeavor.
No fixed number is required.
No.
Potentially. The letter should explain the writer’s independent professional knowledge of the applicant’s work.
Usually the more useful role is to explain professional facts within the expert’s knowledge, leaving legal conclusions to the petition.