Field
Citation density varies considerably among disciplines.
The h-index combines publication quantity and citation activity into one aggregate research metric. It can provide useful context for a researcher's overall scholarly standing, particularly when the metric is interpreted relative to appropriate peers. It does not independently establish every element of EB1A, EB1B or NIW.
Citation density varies considerably among disciplines.
Researchers with longer careers have had more time to accumulate citations.
Different citation databases may produce different values.
A defensible comparison can make the metric substantially more useful.
A fixed threshold ignores differences in field, career stage and the rest of the extraordinary ability evidence.
Explain the field, comparison group, data source and why the metric supports the applicant's overall standing.
No universal h-index threshold exists.
Potentially. Aggregate citation measures can provide useful context for a researcher's overall standing.
Citation databases use different coverage and indexing methods.
No.